Lion Of The Blogosphere

Lion Of The Blogosphere – In my 2012 book, Hockey Sticks and Climate Warfare, I coined the term “resilience strategy.” It aims to explain how special industrial interests and their powerful patrons can attack a group of researchers or scientists like Serengeti lions singling out a zebra from the herd. After all, there is strength in numbers, but individuals and small groups are weaker, and the purpose is two-fold: to undermine the credibility of the wider scientific consensus, and to discourage other researchers. sticking their necks out. public discourse on scientific issues relevant to policy.

When it comes to attacking climate scientists, this approach follows a familiar script. The “buzz” that eventually became a scandal suddenly appeared before an important congressional vote, hearing, or climate policy summit. Scientists are often accused of wrongdoing, fraud, or misuse of data, and accusations are soon made by right-wing blogs, anti-climate websites, and conservative media outlets. Over time, a more objective media was forced to cover the scandal and analyze it responsibly, giving it credibility and oxygen.

Lion Of The Blogosphere

Lion Of The Blogosphere

Important progress on climate policy has been overtaken by the hijacking of public discourse, and vested interests dominate the preservation of fossil fuel reserves.

Of The Most Golden Rules For Bloggers

The latest example of this approach was revealed earlier this week by David Rose, an opinion writer for Britain’s The Daily Mail.

Lion Of The Blogosphere

Known for his misinformation about climate change and his series of attacks on climate scientists, he posted a comment attacking Tom Karl, a scientist I greatly respect and the recently retired director of the National Center for Environmental Information at the US National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. In a 2015 study published in the journal Science, Rose accused Karl and his co-authors of “distorting global warming data.” These charges are based entirely on interviews with a disgruntled NOAA employee, John Bates.

Rose’s accusations were dropped after Bates’ testimony brought the scientific community’s attention to the fact that journalists and other researchers independently and repeatedly corroborated the findings of the 2015 Science Paper. Bates’ second claim that data from scientific papers were not properly archived and “rushed” for publication also fell flat.

Lion Of The Blogosphere

Print Blogosphere Stamp On White Royalty Free Vector Image

However, this latest disinformation campaign has served its purpose, and while it links to technical details that ordinary news users can’t quite fathom, the headlines will add an extra boost to any good intentions. efforts to address climate change.

As a climate scientist, I should know. More than once, I found myself in the middle of such episodes as a result of the “hockey stick” diagrams, or graphical representations of data, published by my fellow authors in the late 1990s. This clearly shows the unprecedented rate of global warming. Although the hockey stick is not the cornerstone of human-caused climate change, the graphic appeal of the character has made it a target of climate change deniers for years.

Lion Of The Blogosphere

A version of the hockey tree diagram popularized by the author and attacked by critics.

Desert Sun Editorial Cartoon For July 31, 2015

In the fall of 2003, days before the US Senate passed a critical resolution recognizing the dangers of human-caused climate change, an article in the journal Energy & Environment, considered a haven for those who climate change skepticism, has been attacked by climate skeptics. hockey stick. A group affiliated with the fossil fuel industry published an op-ed in USA Today on the morning of the Senate vote challenging these criticisms. Oklahoma Republican Sen. James Inhofe, who described climate change as “the biggest con ever to the American people,” read the article aloud during a debate on the Senate floor. The hockey stick criticism soon developed, but it served the short-term purpose of hijacking the debate and the bill failed.

Lion Of The Blogosphere

Two years later, while the House was debating energy and climate legislation, Joe Barton, Republican of Texas, chairman of the House Energy and Commerce Committee and a recipient of fossil fuel money, took part in a widely condemned move. A “witch hunt” against me and the co-authors of the hockey tree. Barton requested all my personal e-mails, correspondence with other scientists, and many other materials to find anything he could use to discredit our work. In the midst of these “investigations,” the bill died in subcommittee.

Then, in the run-up to the 2009 UN climate summit in Copenhagen, emails from international climate scientists, including myself, were hacked from a British research server and published. Bad actors look for out-of-context passages in letters that make them seem awkward or even embarrassing. They are posted on climate change denier websites and then circulated on right-wing blogs and news sites. Before long, even mainstream news organizations were confidently thinking that a series of hacked emails had cast doubt on nearly two centuries of scientific research.

Lion Of The Blogosphere

Pdf) Mapping Socio Cultural Dynamics In Indonesian Blogosphere

At least 10 investigations and reviews have been conducted since the so-called “Climategate” incident, each of which has concluded that the scientists did nothing wrong — in fact, the only mistake was the criminal theft of the emails in the first place. . However, the arguments came after fossil fuel interests helped prevent strong international agreements limiting carbon emissions.

Now we attack Carl and NOAA. This comes at a time when false claims by climate change deniers that global warming has somehow stopped have been thoroughly debunked. After all, we now have three years of consecutive global temperature records, and many published papers have convincingly shown that global warming continues unabated despite short-term natural variability. -new. The most famous of these studies is the one published in 2015 by Karl and colleagues. The paper is widely regarded as putting an end to the dubious argument that global warming has stopped.

Lion Of The Blogosphere

But facts be damned. Shortly after the article went live in the Daily Mail this week, the story went viral in the right-wing blogosphere. A video attacking Carl (and NOAA, and even NASA for good measure) was published by The Wall Street Journal, and Fox News unironically claimed that Tom Carl was “cooked” for climate data and political reasons. Climate change deniers soon announced a pseudo-hype called Climategate 2.0.

The Blogher Voices Of The Year: 2012: Amazon.co.uk: Blogher Inc., Two Busy, Kinghorn, Angie, Nulsen, Charise Rohm, Heck, Dalene, Mcguire, Elizabeth, Superior, Jett, Dennis, Ladonna, Rich, Marci, Arens, Rita, Lam, Thien Kim, Steinhardt,

Lamar Smith, Republican of Texas and chairman of the House Science Committee, who has a history of attacking climate science and climate scientists, quickly posted a press release on the science committee’s website praising the Daily Mail article. This is the right time. Smith planned a congressional hearing within the Environmental Protection Agency designed to cast doubt on the scientific basis for regulating carbon emissions. Suddenly there was a scientific “scandal” that Smith could use to undermine climate science as a whole, the true essence of the Serengeti strategy.

Lion Of The Blogosphere

Even if the 2015 study by Tom Carl and his colleagues is completely wrong, it doesn’t change anything we’ve learned about climate change over two centuries of diverse and disciplined scientific research. But these important facts are not as important to our critics as the optics of a single noise, and, of course, the hidden secrets of a principal investigator or group of scientists. Just as they willfully ignored the many independent studies that reaffirm our “hockey stick” curve in the peer-reviewed scientific literature, Carl’s critics now ignore that his findings have been replicated and validated by other groups of research. -Review of magazines from around the world.

The playbook has hardly changed, but one thing is different today: the latest attack comes amid historic political hostility to science in general and climate science in particular. Now we have a president who calls climate change a Chinese hoax, an administration made up of climate change deniers and representatives of the fossil fuel industry, and a Republican Congress committed to repealing even moderate US carbon pollution regulations. has been implemented until now.

Lion Of The Blogosphere

Follow Up: ‘the Lion King’ And The Future Of Animation

Ten years ago, when the House of Congress and the presidency were in Republican hands, I received support from the Office of Science and Technology Policy under former President George W. Bush when I was attacked by Joe Barton . as well as moderate, science-minded Republicans like Sen. John McCain of Arizona and former Rep. Sherwood Boehlert of New York.

Americans should ask where these well-intentioned conservatives are today. Why don’t they speak out against the recent violence against science and reason? If they can’t voice their concerns, maybe

Lion Of The Blogosphere

Similar Posts